| 
 |  | 
Table of Contents
This chapter describes the various replication features provided by MySQL. It introduces replication concepts, shows how to set up replication servers, and serves as a reference to the available replication options. It also provides a list of frequently asked questions (with answers), and troubleshooting advice for solving replication problems.
For a description of the syntax of replication-related SQL statements, see Section 13.6, “Replication Statements”.
MySQL features support for one-way, asynchronous replication, in which one server acts as the master, while one or more other servers act as slaves. This is in contrast to the synchronous replication which is a characteristic of MySQL Cluster (see Chapter 15, MySQL Cluster).
In single-master replication, the master server writes updates to its binary log files and maintains an index of those files to keep track of log rotation. The binary log files serve as a record of updates to be sent to any slave servers. When a slave connects to its master, it informs the master of the position up to which the slave read the logs at its last successful update. The slave receives any updates that have taken place since that time, and then blocks and waits for the master to notify it of new updates.
A slave server can itself serve as a master if you want to set up chained replication servers.
Multiple-master replication is possible, but raises issues not present in single-master replication. See Section 6.13, “Auto-Increment in Multiple-Master Replication”.
When you are using replication, all updates to the tables that are replicated should be performed on the master server. Otherwise, you must always be careful to avoid conflicts between updates that users make to tables on the master and updates that they make to tables on the slave.
Replication offers benefits for robustness, speed, and system administration:
Robustness is increased with a master/slave setup. In the event of problems with the master, you can switch to the slave as a backup.
          Better response time for clients can be achieved by splitting
          the load for processing client queries between the master and
          slave servers. SELECT queries may be sent
          to the slave to reduce the query processing load of the
          master. Statements that modify data should still be sent to
          the master so that the master and slave do not get out of
          synchrony. This load-balancing strategy is effective if
          non-updating queries dominate, but that is the normal case.
        
Another benefit of using replication is that you can perform database backups using a slave server without disturbing the master. The master continues to process updates while the backup is being made. See Section 5.10.1, “Database Backups”.
MySQL replication is based on the master server keeping track of all changes to your databases (updates, deletes, and so on) in its binary logs. Therefore, to use replication, you must enable binary logging on the master server. See Section 5.12.3, “The Binary Log”.
Each slave server receives from the master the saved updates that the master has recorded in its binary log, so that the slave can execute the same updates on its copy of the data.
It is extremely important to realize that the binary log is simply a record starting from the fixed point in time at which you enable binary logging. Any slaves that you set up need copies of the databases on your master as they existed at the moment you enabled binary logging on the master. If you start your slaves with databases that are not in the same state as those on the master when the binary log was started, your slaves are quite likely to fail.
      One way to copy the master's data to the slave is to use the
      LOAD DATA FROM MASTER statement. However,
      LOAD DATA FROM MASTER works only if all the
      tables on the master use the MyISAM storage
      engine. In addition, this statement acquires a global read lock,
      so no updates on the master are possible while the tables are
      being transferred to the slave. When we implement lock-free hot
      table backup, this global read lock will no longer be necessary.
    
      Due to these limitations, we recommend that at this point you use
      LOAD DATA FROM MASTER only if the dataset on
      the master is relatively small, or if a prolonged read lock on the
      master is acceptable. Although the actual speed of LOAD
      DATA FROM MASTER may vary from system to system, a good
      rule of thumb for how long it takes is 1 second per 1MB of data.
      This is a rough estimate, but you should find it fairly accurate
      if both master and slave are equivalent to 700MHz Pentium CPUs in
      performance and are connected through a 100Mbps network.
    
      After the slave has been set up with a copy of the master's data,
      it connects to the master and waits for updates to process. If the
      master fails, or the slave loses connectivity with your master,
      the slave keeps trying to connect periodically until it is able to
      resume listening for updates. The
      --master-connect-retry option controls the retry
      interval. The default is 60 seconds.
    
Each slave keeps track of where it left off when it last read from its master server. The master has no knowledge of how many slaves it has or which ones are up to date at any given time.
      MySQL replication capabilities are implemented using three threads
      (one on the master server and two on the slave). When a
      START SLAVE statement is issued on a slave
      server, the slave creates an I/O thread, which connects to the
      master and asks it to send the updates recorded in its binary
      logs. The master creates a thread to send the binary log contents
      to the slave. This thread can be identified as the Binlog
      Dump thread in the output of SHOW
      PROCESSLIST on the master. The slave I/O thread reads
      the updates that the master Binlog Dump thread
      sends and copies them to local files, known as relay
      logs, in the slave's data directory. The third thread
      is the SQL thread, which the slave creates to read the relay logs
      and to execute the updates they contain.
    
In the preceding description, there are three threads per master/slave connection. A master that has multiple slaves creates one thread for each currently-connected slave, and each slave has its own I/O and SQL threads.
The slave uses two threads so that reading updates from the master and executing them can be separated into two independent tasks. Thus, the task of reading statements is not slowed down if statement execution is slow. For example, if the slave server has not been running for a while, its I/O thread can quickly fetch all the binary log contents from the master when the slave starts, even if the SQL thread lags far behind. If the slave stops before the SQL thread has executed all the fetched statements, the I/O thread has at least fetched everything so that a safe copy of the statements is stored locally in the slave's relay logs, ready for execution the next time that the slave starts. This enables the master server to purge its binary logs sooner because it no longer needs to wait for the slave to fetch their contents.
      The SHOW PROCESSLIST statement provides
      information that tells you what is happening on the master and on
      the slave regarding replication. The following example illustrates
      how the three threads show up in the output from SHOW
      PROCESSLIST.
    
      On the master server, the output from SHOW
      PROCESSLIST looks like this:
    
mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
     Id: 2
   User: root
   Host: localhost:32931
     db: NULL
Command: Binlog Dump
   Time: 94
  State: Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to
         be updated
   Info: NULL
      Here, thread 2 is a Binlog Dump replication
      thread for a connected slave. The State
      information indicates that all outstanding updates have been sent
      to the slave and that the master is waiting for more updates to
      occur. If you see no Binlog Dump threads on a
      master server, this means that replication is not running —
      that is, that no slaves are currently connected.
    
      On the slave server, the output from SHOW
      PROCESSLIST looks like this:
    
mysql> SHOW PROCESSLIST\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
     Id: 10
   User: system user
   Host:
     db: NULL
Command: Connect
   Time: 11
  State: Waiting for master to send event
   Info: NULL
*************************** 2. row ***************************
     Id: 11
   User: system user
   Host:
     db: NULL
Command: Connect
   Time: 11
  State: Has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O
         thread to update it
   Info: NULL
      This information indicates that thread 10 is the I/O thread that
      is communicating with the master server, and thread 11 is the SQL
      thread that is processing the updates stored in the relay logs. At
      the time that the SHOW PROCESSLIST was run,
      both threads were idle, waiting for further updates.
    
      The value in the Time column can show how late
      the slave is compared to the master. See
      Section 6.10, “Replication FAQ”.
    
        The following list shows the most common states you may see in
        the State column for the master's
        Binlog Dump thread. If you see no
        Binlog Dump threads on a master server, this
        means that replication is not running — that is, that no
        slaves are currently connected.
      
            Sending binlog event to slave
          
Binary logs consist of events, where an event is usually an update plus some other information. The thread has read an event from the binary log and is now sending it to the slave.
            Finished reading one binlog; switching to next
            binlog
          
The thread has finished reading a binary log file and is opening the next one to send to the slave.
            Has sent all binlog to slave; waiting for binlog to
            be updated
          
The thread has read all outstanding updates from the binary logs and sent them to the slave. The thread is now idle, waiting for new events to appear in the binary log resulting from new updates occurring on the master.
            Waiting to finalize termination
          
A very brief state that occurs as the thread is stopping.
        The following list shows the most common states you see in the
        State column for a slave server I/O thread.
        This state also appears in the Slave_IO_State
        column displayed by SHOW SLAVE STATUS, so you
        can get a good view of what is happening by using that
        statement.
      
            Connecting to master
          
The thread is attempting to connect to the master.
            Checking master version
          
A state that occurs very briefly, after the connection to the master is established.
            Registering slave on master
          
A state that occurs very briefly after the connection to the master is established.
            Requesting binlog dump
          
A state that occurs very briefly, after the connection to the master is established. The thread sends to the master a request for the contents of its binary logs, starting from the requested binary log filename and position.
            Waiting to reconnect after a failed binlog dump
            request
          
            If the binary log dump request failed (due to
            disconnection), the thread goes into this state while it
            sleeps, then tries to reconnect periodically. The interval
            between retries can be specified using the
            --master-connect-retry option.
          
            Reconnecting after a failed binlog dump
            request
          
The thread is trying to reconnect to the master.
            Waiting for master to send event
          
            The thread has connected to the master and is waiting for
            binary log events to arrive. This can last for a long time
            if the master is idle. If the wait lasts for
            slave_read_timeout seconds, a timeout
            occurs. At that point, the thread considers the connection
            to be broken and makes an attempt to reconnect.
          
            Queueing master event to the relay log
          
The thread has read an event and is copying it to the relay log so that the SQL thread can process it.
            Waiting to reconnect after a failed master event
            read
          
            An error occurred while reading (due to disconnection). The
            thread is sleeping for
            master-connect-retry seconds before
            attempting to reconnect.
          
            Reconnecting after a failed master event
            read
          
            The thread is trying to reconnect to the master. When
            connection is established again, the state becomes
            Waiting for master to send event.
          
            Waiting for the slave SQL thread to free enough
            relay log space
          
            You are using a non-zero
            relay_log_space_limit value, and the
            relay logs have grown large enough that their combined size
            exceeds this value. The I/O thread is waiting until the SQL
            thread frees enough space by processing relay log contents
            so that it can delete some relay log files.
          
            Waiting for slave mutex on exit
          
A state that occurs briefly as the thread is stopping.
        The following list shows the most common states you may see in
        the State column for a slave server SQL
        thread:
      
            Reading event from the relay log
          
The thread has read an event from the relay log so that the event can be processed.
            Has read all relay log; waiting for the slave I/O
            thread to update it
          
The thread has processed all events in the relay log files, and is now waiting for the I/O thread to write new events to the relay log.
            Waiting for slave mutex on exit
          
A very brief state that occurs as the thread is stopping.
        The State column for the I/O thread may also
        show the text of a statement. This indicates that the thread has
        read an event from the relay log, extracted the statement from
        it, and is executing it.
      
        By default, relay logs filenames have the form
        host_name-relay-bin.nnnnnnhost_name is the name of the
        slave server host and nnnnnn is a
        sequence number. Successive relay log files are created using
        successive sequence numbers, beginning with
        000001. The slave uses an index file to track
        the relay log files currently in use. The default relay log
        index filename is
        host_name-relay-bin.index--relay-log and
        --relay-log-index server options. See
        Section 6.8, “Replication Startup Options”.
      
        Relay logs have the same format as binary logs and can be read
        using mysqlbinlog. The SQL thread
        automatically deletes each relay log file as soon as it has
        executed all events in the file and no longer needs it. There is
        no explicit mechanism for deleting relay logs because the SQL
        thread takes care of doing so. However, FLUSH
        LOGS rotates relay logs, which influences when the SQL
        thread deletes them.
      
A slave server creates a new relay log file under the following conditions:
Each time the I/O thread starts.
            When the logs are flushed; for example, with FLUSH
            LOGS or mysqladmin flush-logs.
          
When the size of the current relay log file becomes too large. The meaning of “too large” is determined as follows:
                If the value of max_relay_log_size is
                greater than 0, that is the maximum relay log file size.
              
                If the value of max_relay_log_size is
                0, max_binlog_size determines the
                maximum relay log file size.
              
        A slave replication server creates two additional small files in
        the data directory. These status files are
        named master.info and
        relay-log.info by default. Their names can
        be changed by using the --master-info-file and
        --relay-log-info-file options. See
        Section 6.8, “Replication Startup Options”.
      
        The two status files contain information like that shown in the
        output of the SHOW SLAVE STATUS statement,
        which is discussed in Section 13.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”.
        Because the status files are stored on disk, they survive a
        slave server's shutdown. The next time the slave starts up, it
        reads the two files to determine how far it has proceeded in
        reading binary logs from the master and in processing its own
        relay logs.
      
        The I/O thread updates the master.info
        file. The following table shows the correspondence between the
        lines in the file and the columns displayed by SHOW
        SLAVE STATUS.
      
| Line | Description | 
| 1 | Number of lines in the file | 
| 2 | Master_Log_File | 
| 3 | Read_Master_Log_Pos | 
| 4 | Master_Host | 
| 5 | Master_User | 
| 6 | Password (not shown by SHOW SLAVE STATUS) | 
| 7 | Master_Port | 
| 8 | Connect_Retry | 
| 9 | Master_SSL_Allowed | 
| 10 | Master_SSL_CA_File | 
| 11 | Master_SSL_CA_Path | 
| 12 | Master_SSL_Cert | 
| 13 | Master_SSL_Cipher | 
| 14 | Master_SSL_Key | 
        The SQL thread updates the relay-log.info
        file. The following table shows the correspondence between the
        lines in the file and the columns displayed by SHOW
        SLAVE STATUS.
      
| Line | Description | 
| 1 | Relay_Log_File | 
| 2 | Relay_Log_Pos | 
| 3 | Relay_Master_Log_File | 
| 4 | Exec_Master_Log_Pos | 
        When you back up the slave's data, you should back up these two
        status files as well, along with the relay log files. They are
        needed to resume replication after you restore the slave's data.
        If you lose the relay logs but still have the
        relay-log.info file, you can check it to
        determine how far the SQL thread has executed in the master
        binary logs. Then you can use CHANGE MASTER
        TO with the MASTER_LOG_FILE and
        MASTER_LOG_POS options to tell the slave to
        re-read the binary logs from that point. Of course, this
        requires that the binary logs still exist on the master server.
      
        If your slave is subject to replicating LOAD DATA
        INFILE statements, you should also back up any
        SQL_LOAD-* files that exist in the
        directory that the slave uses for this purpose. The slave needs
        these files to resume replication of any interrupted
        LOAD DATA INFILE operations. The directory
        location is specified using the
        --slave-load-tmpdir option. If this option is
        not specified, the directory location is the value of the
        tmpdir system variable.
      
This section briefly describes how to set up complete replication of a MySQL server. It assumes that you want to replicate all databases on the master and have not previously configured replication. You must shut down your master server briefly to complete the steps outlined here.
This procedure is written in terms of setting up a single slave, but you can repeat it to set up multiple slaves.
Although this method is the most straightforward way to set up a slave, it is not the only one. For example, if you have a snapshot of the master's data, and the master already has its server ID set and binary logging enabled, you can set up a slave without shutting down the master or even blocking updates to it. For more details, please see Section 6.10, “Replication FAQ”.
If you want to administer a MySQL replication setup, we suggest that you read this entire chapter through and try all statements mentioned in Section 13.6.1, “SQL Statements for Controlling Master Servers”, and Section 13.6.2, “SQL Statements for Controlling Slave Servers”. You should also familiarize yourself with the replication startup options described in Section 6.8, “Replication Startup Options”.
      Note: This procedure and some of
      the replication SQL statements shown in later sections require the
      SUPER privilege.
    
Make sure that the versions of MySQL installed on the master and slave are compatible according to the table shown in Section 6.5, “Replication Compatibility Between MySQL Versions”. Ideally, you should use the most recent version of MySQL on both master and slave.
If you encounter a problem, please do not report it as a bug until you have verified that the problem is present in the latest MySQL release.
          Set up an account on the master server that the slave server
          can use to connect. This account must be given the
          REPLICATION SLAVE privilege. If the account
          is used only for replication (which is recommended), you don't
          need to grant any additional privileges.
        
          Suppose that your domain is mydomain.com
          and that you want to create an account with a username of
          repl such that slave servers can use the
          account to access the master server from any host in your
          domain using a password of slavepass. To
          create the account, use this GRANT
          statement:
        
mysql>GRANT REPLICATION SLAVE ON *.*->TO 'repl'@'%.mydomain.com' IDENTIFIED BY 'slavepass';
          If you plan to use the LOAD TABLE FROM
          MASTER or LOAD DATA FROM MASTER
          statements from the slave host, you must grant this account
          additional privileges:
        
              Grant the account the SUPER and
              RELOAD global privileges.
            
              Grant the SELECT privilege for all
              tables that you want to load. Any master tables from which
              the account cannot SELECT will be
              ignored by LOAD DATA FROM MASTER.
            
For additional information about setting up user accounts and privileges, see Section 5.9, “MySQL User Account Management”.
          Flush all the tables and block write statements by executing a
          FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK statement:
        
mysql> FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
          For InnoDB tables, note that FLUSH
          TABLES WITH READ LOCK also blocks
          COMMIT operations. When you have acquired a
          global read lock, you can start a filesystem snapshot of your
          InnoDB tables. Internally (inside the
          InnoDB storage engine) the snapshot won't
          be consistent (because the InnoDB caches
          are not flushed), but this is not a cause for concern, because
          InnoDB resolves this at startup and
          delivers a consistent result. This means that
          InnoDB can perform crash recovery when
          started on this snapshot, without corruption. However, there
          is no way to stop the MySQL server while insuring a consistent
          snapshot of your InnoDB tables.
        
          Leave running the client from which you issue the
          FLUSH TABLES statement so that the read
          lock remains in effect. (If you exit the client, the lock is
          released.) Then take a snapshot of the data on your master
          server.
        
The easiest way to create a snapshot is to use an archiving program to make a binary backup of the databases in your master's data directory. For example, use tar on Unix, or PowerArchiver, WinRAR, WinZip, or any similar software on Windows. To use tar to create an archive that includes all databases, change location into the master server's data directory, then execute this command:
shell> tar -cvf /tmp/mysql-snapshot.tar .
          If you want the archive to include only a database called
          this_db, use this command instead:
        
shell> tar -cvf /tmp/mysql-snapshot.tar ./this_db
          Then copy the archive file to the /tmp
          directory on the slave server host. On that machine, change
          location into the slave's data directory, and unpack the
          archive file using this command:
        
shell> tar -xvf /tmp/mysql-snapshot.tar
          You may not want to replicate the mysql
          database if the slave server has a different set of user
          accounts from those that exist on the master. In this case,
          you should exclude it from the archive. You also need not
          include any log files in the archive, or the
          master.info or
          relay-log.info files.
        
          While the read lock placed by FLUSH TABLES WITH READ
          LOCK is in effect, read the value of the current
          binary log name and offset on the master:
        
mysql > SHOW MASTER STATUS;
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+
| File          | Position | Binlog_Do_DB | Binlog_Ignore_DB |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+
| mysql-bin.003 | 73       | test         | manual,mysql     |
+---------------+----------+--------------+------------------+
          The File column shows the name of the log
          and Position shows the offset within the
          file. In this example, the binary log file is
          mysql-bin.003 and the offset is 73. Record
          these values. You need them later when you are setting up the
          slave. They represent the replication coordinates at which the
          slave should begin processing new updates from the master.
        
          If the master has been running previously without binary
          logging enabled, the log name and position values displayed by
          SHOW MASTER STATUS or mysqldump
          --master-data will be empty. In that case, the
          values that you need to use later when specifying the slave's
          log file and position are the empty string
          ('') and 4.
        
After you have taken the snapshot and recorded the log name and offset, you can re-enable write activity on the master:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
          If you are using InnoDB tables, ideally you
          should use the InnoDB Hot
          Backup tool, which takes a consistent snapshot
          without acquiring any locks on the master server, and records
          the log name and offset corresponding to the snapshot to be
          later used on the slave. Hot Backup is an
          additional non-free (commercial) tool that is not included in
          the standard MySQL distribution. See the
          InnoDB Hot Backup home
          page at http://www.innodb.com/manual.php for
          detailed information.
        
          Without the Hot Backup tool, the quickest
          way to take a binary snapshot of InnoDB
          tables is to shut down the master server and copy the
          InnoDB data files, log files, and table
          format files (.frm files). To record the
          current log file name and offset, you should issue the
          following statements before you shut down the server:
        
mysql>FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;mysql>SHOW MASTER STATUS;
          Then record the log name and the offset from the output of
          SHOW MASTER STATUS as was shown earlier.
          After recording the log name and the offset, shut down the
          server without unlocking the tables to
          make sure that the server goes down with the snapshot
          corresponding to the current log file and offset:
        
shell> mysqladmin -u root shutdown
          An alternative that works for both MyISAM
          and InnoDB tables is to take an SQL dump of
          the master instead of a binary copy as described in the
          preceding discussion. For this, you can use mysqldump
          --master-data on your master and later load the SQL
          dump file into your slave. However, this is slower than doing
          a binary copy.
        
          Make sure that the [mysqld] section of the
          my.cnf file on the master host includes a
          log-bin option. The section should also
          have a
          server-id=
          option, where master_idmaster_id must be a
          positive integer value from 1 to
          232 – 1. For example:
        
[mysqld] log-bin=mysql-bin server-id=1
If those options are not present, add them and restart the server. The server cannot act as a replication master unless binary logging is enabled.
          Note: For the greatest
          possible durability and consistency in a replication setup
          using InnoDB with transactions, you should
          use innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit=1,
          sync_binlog=1, and, before MySQL 5.0.3,
          innodb_safe_binlog, in the master
          my.cnf file.
          (innodb_safe_binlog is not needed from
          5.0.3 on.)
        
          Stop the server that is to be used as a slave and add the
          following lines to its my.cnf file:
        
[mysqld]
server-id=slave_id
          The slave_id value, like the
          master_id value, must be a positive
          integer value from 1 to 232 –
          1. In addition, it is necessary that the ID of the slave be
          different from the ID of the master. For example:
        
[mysqld] server-id=2
          If you are setting up multiple slaves, each one must have a
          unique server-id value that differs from
          that of the master and from each of the other slaves. Think of
          server-id values as something similar to IP
          addresses: These IDs uniquely identify each server instance in
          the community of replication partners.
        
          If you do not specify a server-id value, it
          is set to 1 if you have not defined
          master-host; otherwise it is set to 2. Note
          that in the case of server-id omission, a
          master refuses connections from all slaves, and a slave
          refuses to connect to a master. Thus, omitting
          server-id is good only for backup with a
          binary log.
        
If you made a binary backup of the master server's data, copy it to the slave server's data directory before starting the slave. Make sure that the privileges on the files and directories are correct. The system account that you use to run the slave server must be able to read and write the files, just as on the master.
If you made a backup using mysqldump, start the slave first. The dump file is loaded in a later step.
          Start the slave server. If it has been replicating previously,
          start the slave server with the
          --skip-slave-start option so that it doesn't
          immediately try to connect to its master. You also may want to
          start the slave server with the
          --log-warnings option to get more messages in
          the error log about problems (for example, network or
          connection problems). The option is enabled by default, but
          aborted connections are not logged to the error log unless the
          option value is greater than 1.
        
If you made a backup of the master server's data using mysqldump, load the dump file into the slave server:
shell> mysql -u root -p < dump_file.sql
Execute the following statement on the slave, replacing the option values with the actual values relevant to your system:
mysql>CHANGE MASTER TO->MASTER_HOST='->master_host_name',MASTER_USER='->replication_user_name',MASTER_PASSWORD='->replication_password',MASTER_LOG_FILE='->recorded_log_file_name',MASTER_LOG_POS=recorded_log_position;
The following table shows the maximum allowable length for the string-valued options:
| MASTER_HOST | 60 | 
| MASTER_USER | 16 | 
| MASTER_PASSWORD | 32 | 
| MASTER_LOG_FILE | 255 | 
Start the slave threads:
mysql> START SLAVE;
After you have performed this procedure, the slave should connect to the master and catch up on any updates that have occurred since the snapshot was taken.
      If you have forgotten to set the server-id
      option for the master, slaves cannot connect to it.
    
      If you have forgotten to set the server-id
      option for the slave, you get the following error in the slave's
      error log:
    
Warning: You should set server-id to a non-0 value if master_host is set; we will force server id to 2, but this MySQL server will not act as a slave.
You also find error messages in the slave's error log if it is not able to replicate for any other reason.
      Once a slave is replicating, you can find in its data directory
      one file named master.info and another named
      relay-log.info. The slave uses these two
      files to keep track of how much of the master's binary log it has
      processed. Do not remove or edit these files
      unless you know exactly what you are doing and fully understand
      the implications. Even in that case, it is preferred that you use
      the CHANGE MASTER TO statement to change
      replication parameters. The slave will use the values specified in
      the statement to update the status files automatically.
    
      Note: The content of
      master.info overrides some of the server
      options specified on the command line or in
      my.cnf. See
      Section 6.8, “Replication Startup Options”, for more details.
    
Once you have a snapshot of the master, you can use it to set up other slaves by following the slave portion of the procedure just described. You do not need to take another snapshot of the master; you can use the same one for each slave.
      The binary log format as implemented in MySQL 5.0 is
      considerably different from that used in previous versions. Major
      changes were made in MySQL 5.0.3 (for improvements to handling of
      character sets and LOAD DATA INFILE) and 5.0.4
      (for improvements to handling of time zones).
    
We recommend using the most recent MySQL version available because replication capabilities are continually being improved. We also recommend using the same version for both the master and the slave. We recommend upgrading masters and slaves running alpha or beta versions to new (production) versions. Replication from a 5.0.3 master to a 5.0.2 slave will fail; from a 5.0.4 master to a 5.0.3 slave will also fail. In general, slaves running MySQL 5.0.x can be used with older masters (even those running MySQL 3.23, 4.0, or 4.1), but not the reverse.
Note: You cannot replicate from a master that uses a newer binary log format to a slave that uses an older format (for example, from MySQL 5.0 to MySQL 4.1.) This has significant implications for upgrading replication servers, as described in Section 6.6, “Upgrading a Replication Setup”.
The preceding information pertains to replication compatibility at the protocol level. However, there can be other constraints, such as SQL-level compatibility issues. For example, a 5.0 master cannot replicate to a 4.1 slave if the replicated statements use SQL features available in 5.0 but not in 4.1. These and other issues are discussed in Section 6.7, “Replication Features and Known Problems”.
When you upgrade servers that participate in a replication setup, the procedure for upgrading depends on the current server versions and the version to which you are upgrading.
This section applies to upgrading replication from MySQL 3.23, 4.0, or 4.1 to MySQL 5.0. A 4.0 server should be 4.0.3 or newer.
When you upgrade a master to 5.0 from an earlier MySQL release series, you should first ensure that all the slaves of this master are using the same 5.0.x release. If this is not the case, you should first upgrade the slaves. To upgrade each slave, shut it down, upgrade it to the appropriate 5.0.x version, restart it, and restart replication. The 5.0 slave is able to read the old relay logs written prior to the upgrade and to execute the statements they contain. Relay logs created by the slave after the upgrade are in 5.0 format.
After the slaves have been upgraded, shut down the master, upgrade it to the same 5.0.x release as the slaves, and restart it. The 5.0 master is able to read the old binary logs written prior to the upgrade and to send them to the 5.0 slaves. The slaves recognize the old format and handle it properly. Binary logs created by the master following the upgrade are in 5.0 format. These too are recognized by the 5.0 slaves.
In other words, there are no measures to take when upgrading to MySQL 5.0, except that the slaves must be MySQL 5.0 before you can upgrade the master to 5.0. Note that downgrading from 5.0 to older versions does not work so simply: You must ensure that any 5.0 binary logs or relay logs have been fully processed, so that you can remove them before proceeding with the downgrade.
      In general, replication compatibility at the SQL level requires
      that any features used be supported by both the master and the
      slave servers. If you use a feature on a master server that is
      available only as of a given version of MySQL, you cannot
      replicate to a slave that is older than that version. Such
      incompatibilities are likely to occur between series, so that, for
      example, you cannot replicate from MySQL 5.0 to
      4.1. However, these incompatibilities also can occur
      for within-series replication. For example, the
      SLEEP() function is available in MySQL 5.0.12
      and up. If you use this function on the master server, you cannot
      replicate to a slave server that is older than MySQL 5.0.12.
    
If you are planning to use replication between 5.0 and a previous version of MySQL you should consult the edition of the MySQL Reference Manual corresponding to the earlier release series for information regarding the replication characteristics of that series.
      The following list provides details about what is supported and
      what is not. Additional InnoDB-specific
      information about replication is given in
      Section 14.2.6.5, “InnoDB and MySQL Replication”.
    
Replication issues with regard to stored routines and triggers is described in Section 17.4, “Binary Logging of Stored Routines and Triggers”.
          Known issue: In MySQL 5.0.17,
          the syntax for CREATE TRIGGER changed to
          include a DEFINER clause for specifying
          which access privileges to check at trigger invocation time.
          (See Section 18.1, “CREATE TRIGGER Syntax”, for more information.)
          However, if you attempt to replicate from a master server
          older than MySQL 5.0.17 to a slave running MySQL 5.0.17
          through 5.0.19, replication of CREATE
          TRIGGER statements fails on the slave with a
          Definer not fully qualified error. A
          workaround is to create triggers on the master using a
          version-specific comment embedded in each CREATE
          TRIGGER statement:
        
CREATE /*!50017 DEFINER = 'root'@'localhost' */ TRIGGER ... ;
          CREATE TRIGGER statements written this way
          will replicate to newer slaves, which pick up the
          DEFINER clause from the comment and execute
          successfully.
        
This slave problem is fixed as of MySQL 5.0.20.
          Replication of AUTO_INCREMENT,
          LAST_INSERT_ID(), and
          TIMESTAMP values is done correctly.
        
          The USER(), UUID(), and
          LOAD_FILE() functions are replicated
          without change and thus do not work reliably on the slave.
        
          User privileges are replicated only if the
          mysql database is replicated. That is, the
          GRANT, REVOKE,
          SET PASSWORD, CREATE
          USER, and DROP USER statements
          take effect on the slave only if the replication setup
          includes the mysql database.
        
          If you're replicating all databases, but don't want statements
          that affect user privileges to be replicated, set up the slave
          to not replicate the mysql database, using
          the --replicate-wild-ignore-table=mysql.%
          option. The slave will recognize that issuing
          privilege-related SQL statements won't have an effect, and
          thus not execute those statements.
        
          The GET_LOCK(),
          RELEASE_LOCK(),
          IS_FREE_LOCK(), and
          IS_USED_LOCK() functions that handle
          user-level locks are replicated without the slave knowing the
          concurrency context on master. Therefore, these functions
          should not be used to insert into a master's table because the
          content on the slave would differ. (For example, do not issue
          a statement such as INSERT INTO mytable
          VALUES(GET_LOCK(...)).)
        
          The FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS,
          SQL_MODE, UNIQUE_CHECKS,
          and SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL variables are all
          replicated in MySQL 5.0. The
          storage_engine system variable (also known
          as table_type) is not yet replicated, which
          is a good thing for replication between different storage
          engines.
        
Starting from MySQL 5.0.3 (master and slave), replication works even if the master and slave have different global character set variables. Starting from MySQL 5.0.4 (master and slave), replication works even if the master and slave have different global time zone variables.
The following applies to replication between MySQL servers that use different character sets:
              If the master uses MySQL 4.1, you must
              always use the same
              global character set and collation on
              the master and the slave, regardless of the MySQL version
              running on the slave. (These are controlled by the
              --character-set-server and
              --collation-server options.) Otherwise,
              you may get duplicate-key errors on the slave, because a
              key that is unique in the master character set might not
              be unique in the slave character set. Note that this is
              not a cause for concern when master and slave are both
              MySQL 5.0 or later.
            
              If the master is older than MySQL 4.1.3, the character set
              of any client should never be made different from its
              global value because this character set change is not
              known to the slave. In other words, clients should not use
              SET NAMES, SET CHARACTER
              SET, and so forth. If both the master and the
              slave are 4.1.3 or newer, clients can freely set session
              values for character set variables because these settings
              are written to the binary log and so are known to the
              slave. That is, clients can use SET
              NAMES or SET CHARACTER SET or
              can set variables such as
              collation_client or
              collation_server. However, clients are
              prevented from changing the global
              value of these variables; as stated previously, the master
              and slave must always have identical global character set
              values.
            
              If you have databases on the master with character sets
              that differ from the global
              character_set_server value, you should
              design your CREATE TABLE statements so
              that tables in those databases do not implicitly rely on
              the database default character set (see Bug #2326). A good
              workaround is to state the character set and collation
              explicitly in CREATE TABLE statements.
            
          If the master uses MySQL 4.1, the same system time zone should
          be set for both master and slave. Otherwise some statements
          will not be replicated properly, such as statements that use
          the NOW() or
          FROM_UNIXTIME() functions. You can set the
          time zone in which MySQL server runs by using the
          --timezone=
          option of the timezone_namemysqld_safe script or by
          setting the TZ environment variable. Both
          master and slave should also have the same default connection
          time zone setting; that is, the
          --default-time-zone parameter should have the
          same value for both master and slave. Note that this is not
          necessary when the master is MySQL 5.0 or later.
        
          CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@global.time_zone) is
          not properly replicated.
          CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@session.time_zone) is
          properly replicated only if the master and slave are from
          MySQL 5.0.4 or newer.
        
          Session variables are not replicated properly when used in
          statements that update tables. For example, SET
          MAX_JOIN_SIZE=1000 followed by INSERT INTO
          mytable VALUES(@@MAX_JOIN_SIZE) will not insert the
          same data on the master and the slave. This does not apply to
          the common sequence of SET TIME_ZONE=...
          followed by INSERT INTO mytable
          VALUES(CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@time_zone)), which
          replicates correctly as of MySQL 5.0.4.
        
          It is possible to replicate transactional tables on the master
          using non-transactional tables on the slave. For example, you
          can replicate an InnoDB master table as a
          MyISAM slave table. However, if you do
          this, there are problems if the slave is stopped in the middle
          of a BEGIN/COMMIT block
          because the slave restarts at the beginning of the
          BEGIN block.
        
          Update statements that refer to user-defined variables (that
          is, variables of the form
          @) are
          replicated correctly in MySQL 5.0. However, this
          is not true for versions prior to 4.1. Note that user variable
          names are case insensitive starting in MySQL 5.0. You should
          take this into account when setting up replication between
          MySQL 5.0 and older versions.
        var_name
Slaves can connect to masters using SSL.
          In MySQL 5.0 (starting from 5.0.3), there is a
          global system variable
          slave_transaction_retries: If the
          replication slave SQL thread fails to execute a transaction
          because of an InnoDB deadlock or because it
          exceeded the InnoDB
          innodb_lock_wait_timeout or the NDBCluster
          TransactionDeadlockDetectionTimeout or
          TransactionInactiveTimeout value, the
          transaction automatically retries
          slave_transaction_retries times before
          stopping with an error. The default value is 10. Starting from
          MySQL 5.0.4, the total retry count can be seen in the output
          of SHOW STATUS; see
          Section 5.2.4, “Server Status Variables”.
        
          If a DATA DIRECTORY or INDEX
          DIRECTORY table option is used in a CREATE
          TABLE statement on the master server, the table
          option is also used on the slave. This can cause problems if
          no corresponding directory exists in the slave host filesystem
          or if it exists but is not accessible to the slave server.
          MySQL supports an sql_mode option called
          NO_DIR_IN_CREATE. If the slave server is
          run with this SQL mode enabled, it ignores the DATA
          DIRECTORY and INDEX DIRECTORY
          table options when replicating CREATE TABLE
          statements. The result is that MyISAM data
          and index files are created in the table's database directory.
        
It is possible for the data on the master and slave to become different if a statement is designed in such a way that the data modification is non-deterministic; that is, left to the will of the query optimizer. (This is in general not a good practice, even outside of replication.) For a detailed explanation of this issue, see Section A.8.1, “Open Issues in MySQL”.
          The following applies only if either the master or
          the slave is running MySQL version 5.0.3 or older:
          If on the master a LOAD DATA INFILE is
          interrupted (integrity constraint violation, killed
          connection, and so on), the slave skips the LOAD DATA
          INFILE entirely. This means that if this command
          permanently inserted or updated table records before being
          interrupted, these modifications are not replicated to the
          slave.
        
          Some forms of the FLUSH statement are not
          logged because they could cause problems if replicated to a
          slave: FLUSH LOGS, FLUSH
          MASTER, FLUSH SLAVE, and
          FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK. For a syntax
          example, see Section 13.5.5.2, “FLUSH Syntax”. The FLUSH
          TABLES, ANALYZE TABLE,
          OPTIMIZE TABLE, and REPAIR
          TABLE statements are written to the binary log and
          thus replicated to slaves. This is not normally a problem
          because these statements do not modify table data. However,
          this can cause difficulties under certain circumstances. If
          you replicate the privilege tables in the
          mysql database and update those tables
          directly without using GRANT, you must
          issue a FLUSH PRIVILEGES on the slaves to
          put the new privileges into effect. In addition, if you use
          FLUSH TABLES when renaming a
          MyISAM table that is part of a
          MERGE table, you must issue FLUSH
          TABLES manually on the slaves. These statements are
          written to the binary log unless you specify
          NO_WRITE_TO_BINLOG or its alias
          LOCAL.
        
          MySQL supports only one master and many slaves. In the future
          we plan to add a voting algorithm for changing the master
          automatically in the event of problems with the current
          master. We also plan to introduce agent processes to help
          perform load balancing by sending SELECT
          queries to different slaves.
        
          When a server shuts down and restarts, its
          MEMORY (HEAP tables
          become empty. The master replicates this effect to slaves as
          follows: The first time that the master uses each
          MEMORY table after startup, it logs an
          event that notifies the slaves that the table needs to be
          emptied by writing a DELETE statement for
          that table to the binary log. See
          Section 14.4, “The MEMORY (HEAP) Storage Engine”, for more information.
        
Temporary tables are replicated except in the case where you shut down the slave server (not just the slave threads) and you have replicated temporary tables that are used in updates that have not yet been executed on the slave. If you shut down the slave server, the temporary tables needed by those updates are no longer available when the slave is restarted. To avoid this problem, do not shut down the slave while it has temporary tables open. Instead, use the following procedure:
              Issue a STOP SLAVE statement.
            
              Use SHOW STATUS to check the value of
              the Slave_open_temp_tables variable.
            
If the value is 0, issue a mysqladmin shutdown command to stop the slave.
              If the value is not 0, restart the slave threads with
              START SLAVE.
            
              Repeat the procedure later until the
              Slave_open_temp_tables variable is 0
              and you can stop the slave.
            
          The syntax for multiple-table DELETE
          statements that use table aliases changed between MySQL 4.0
          and 4.1. In MySQL 4.0, you should use the true table name to
          refer to any table from which rows should be deleted:
        
DELETE test FROM test AS t1, test2 WHERE ...
In MySQL 4.1, you must use the alias:
DELETE t1 FROM test AS t1, test2 WHERE ...
          If you use such DELETE statements, the
          change in syntax means that a 4.0 master cannot replicate to
          4.1 (or higher) slaves.
        
          It is safe to connect servers in a circular master/slave
          relationship if you use the
          --log-slave-updates option. That means that
          you can create a setup such as this:
        
A -> B -> C -> A
However, many statements do not work correctly in this kind of setup unless your client code is written to take care of the potential problems that can occur from updates that occur in different sequence on different servers.
          Server IDs are encoded in binary log events, so server A knows
          when an event that it reads was originally created by itself
          and does not execute the event (unless server A was started
          with the --replicate-same-server-id option,
          which is meaningful only in rare cases). Thus, there are no
          infinite loops. This type of circular setup works only if you
          perform no conflicting updates between the tables. In other
          words, if you insert data in both A and C, you should never
          insert a row in A that may have a key that conflicts with a
          row inserted in C. You should also not update the same rows on
          two servers if the order in which the updates are applied is
          significant.
        
          If a statement on a slave produces an error, the slave SQL
          thread terminates, and the slave writes a message to its error
          log. You should then connect to the slave manually and
          determine the cause of the problem. (SHOW SLAVE
          STATUS is useful for this.) Then fix the problem
          (for example, you might need to create a non-existent table)
          and run START SLAVE.
        
          It is safe to shut down a master server and restart it later.
          When a slave loses its connection to the master, the slave
          tries to reconnect immediately and retries periodically if
          that fails. The default is to retry every 60 seconds. This may
          be changed with the --master-connect-retry
          option. A slave also is able to deal with network connectivity
          outages. However, the slave notices the network outage only
          after receiving no data from the master for
          slave_net_timeout seconds. If your outages
          are short, you may want to decrease
          slave_net_timeout. See
          Section 5.2.2, “Server System Variables”.
        
          Shutting down the slave (cleanly) is also safe because it
          keeps track of where it left off. Unclean shutdowns might
          produce problems, especially if the disk cache was not flushed
          to disk before the system went down. Your system fault
          tolerance is greatly increased if you have a good
          uninterruptible power supply. Unclean shutdowns of the master
          may cause inconsistencies between the content of tables and
          the binary log in master; this can be avoided by using
          InnoDB tables and the
          --innodb-safe-binlog option on the master.
          See Section 5.12.3, “The Binary Log”.
        
          Note:
          --innodb-safe-binlog is unneeded as of MySQL
          5.0.3, having been made obsolete by the introduction of XA
          transaction support.
        
          Due to the non-transactional nature of
          MyISAM tables, it is possible to have a
          statement that only partially updates a table and returns an
          error code. This can happen, for example, on a multiple-row
          insert that has one row violating a key constraint, or if a
          long update statement is killed after updating some of the
          rows. If that happens on the master, the slave thread exits
          and waits for the database administrator to decide what to do
          about it unless the error code is legitimate and execution of
          the statement results in the same error code on the slave. If
          this error code validation behavior is not desirable, some or
          all errors can be masked out (ignored) with the
          --slave-skip-errors option.
        
          If you update transactional tables from non-transactional
          tables inside a
          BEGIN/COMMIT sequence,
          updates to the binary log may be out of synchrony with table
          states if the non-transactional table is updated before the
          transaction commits. This occurs because the transaction is
          written to the binary log only when it is committed.
        
          In situations where transactions mix updates to transactional
          and non-transactional tables, the order of statements in the
          binary log is correct, and all needed statements are written
          to the binary log even in case of a
          ROLLBACK. However, when a second connection
          updates the non-transactional table before the first
          connection's transaction is complete, statements can be logged
          out of order, because the second connection's update is
          written immediately after it is performed, regardless of the
          state of the transaction being performed by the first
          connection.
        
This section describes the options that you can use on slave replication servers. You can specify these options either on the command line or in an option file.
      On the master and each slave, you must use the
      server-id option to establish a unique
      replication ID. For each server, you should pick a unique positive
      integer in the range from 1 to 232
      – 1, and each ID must be different from every other ID.
      Example: server-id=3
    
Options that you can use on the master server for controlling binary logging are described in Section 5.12.3, “The Binary Log”.
      Some slave server replication options are handled in a special
      way, in the sense that each is ignored if a
      master.info file exists when the slave starts
      and contains a value for the option. The following options are
      handled this way:
    
          --master-host
        
          --master-user
        
          --master-password
        
          --master-port
        
          --master-connect-retry
        
          --master-ssl
        
          --master-ssl-ca
        
          --master-ssl-capath
        
          --master-ssl-cert
        
          --master-ssl-cipher
        
          --master-ssl-key
        
      The master.info file format in MySQL
      5.0 includes values corresponding to the SSL options.
      In addition, the file format includes as its first line the number
      of lines in the file. (See Section 6.3.4, “Replication Relay and Status Files”.) If you
      upgrade an older server (before MySQL 4.1.1) to a newer version,
      the new server upgrades the master.info file
      to the new format automatically when it starts. However, if you
      downgrade a newer server to an older version, you should remove
      the first line manually before starting the older server for the
      first time.
    
      If no master.info file exists when the slave
      server starts, it uses the values for those options that are
      specified in option files or on the command line. This occurs when
      you start the server as a replication slave for the very first
      time, or when you have run RESET SLAVE and then
      have shut down and restarted the slave.
    
      If the master.info file exists when the slave
      server starts, the server uses its contents and ignores any
      options that correspond to the values listed in the file. Thus, if
      you start the slave server with different values of the startup
      options that correspond to values in the
      master.info file, the different values have
      no effect, because the server continues to use the
      master.info file. To use different values,
      you must either restart after removing the
      master.info file or (preferably) use the
      CHANGE MASTER TO statement to reset the values
      while the slave is running.
    
      Suppose that you specify this option in your
      my.cnf file:
    
[mysqld]
master-host=some_host
      The first time you start the server as a replication slave, it
      reads and uses that option from the my.cnf
      file. The server then records the value in the
      master.info file. The next time you start the
      server, it reads the master host value from the
      master.info file only and ignores the value
      in the option file. If you modify the my.cnf
      file to specify a different master host of
      some_other_host, the change still has
      no effect. You should use CHANGE MASTER TO
      instead.
    
      Because the server gives an existing
      master.info file precedence over the startup
      options just described, you might prefer not to use startup
      options for these values at all, and instead specify them by using
      the CHANGE MASTER TO statement. See
      Section 13.6.2.1, “CHANGE MASTER TO Syntax”.
    
This example shows a more extensive use of startup options to configure a slave server:
[mysqld] server-id=2 master-host=db-master.mycompany.com master-port=3306 master-user=pertinax master-password=freitag master-connect-retry=60 report-host=db-slave.mycompany.com
      The following list describes startup options for controlling
      replication. Many of these options can be reset while the server
      is running by using the CHANGE MASTER TO
      statement. Others, such as the --replicate-*
      options, can be set only when the slave server starts.
    
          Normally, a slave does not log to its own binary log any
          updates that are received from a master server. This option
          tells the slave to log the updates performed by its SQL thread
          to its own binary log. For this option to have any effect, the
          slave must also be started with the --log-bin
          option to enable binary logging.
          --log-slave-updates is used when you want to
          chain replication servers. For example, you might want to set
          up replication servers using this arrangement:
        
A -> B -> C
          Here, A serves as the master for the slave B, and B serves as
          the master for the slave C. For this to work, B must be both a
          master and a slave. You must start both A
          and B with --log-bin to enable binary
          logging, and B with the --log-slave-updates
          option so that updates received from A are logged by B to its
          binary log.
        
          This option causes a server to print more messages to the
          error log about what it is doing. With respect to replication,
          the server generates warnings that it succeeded in
          reconnecting after a network/connection failure, and informs
          you as to how each slave thread started. This option is
          enabled by default; to disable it, use
          --skip-log-warnings. Aborted connections are
          not logged to the error log unless the value is greater than
          1.
        
          
          
          --master-connect-retry=
        seconds
          The number of seconds that the slave thread sleeps before
          trying to reconnect to the master in case the master goes down
          or the connection is lost. The value in the
          master.info file takes precedence if it
          can be read. If not set, the default is 60.
        
          The hostname or IP number of the master replication server.
          The value in master.info takes precedence
          if it can be read. If no master host is specified, the slave
          thread does not start.
        
          The name to use for the file in which the slave records
          information about the master. The default name is
          master.info in the data directory.
        
          The password of the account that the slave thread uses for
          authentication when it connects to the master. The value in
          the master.info file takes precedence if
          it can be read. If not set, an empty password is assumed.
        
          The TCP/IP port number that the master is listening on. The
          value in the master.info file takes
          precedence if it can be read. If not set, the compiled-in
          setting is assumed (normally 3306).
        
The number of times that the slave tries to connect to the master before giving up.
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          
          --master-ssl,
          --master-ssl-ca=,
          file_name--master-ssl-capath=,
          directory_name--master-ssl-cert=,
          file_name--master-ssl-cipher=,
          cipher_list--master-ssl-key=
        file_name
          These options are used for setting up a secure replication
          connection to the master server using SSL. Their meanings are
          the same as the corresponding --ssl,
          --ssl-ca, --ssl-capath,
          --ssl-cert, --ssl-cipher,
          --ssl-key options that are described in
          Section 5.9.7.5, “SSL Command Options”. The values in the
          master.info file take precedence if they
          can be read.
        
          The username of the account that the slave thread uses for
          authentication when it connects to the master. This account
          must have the REPLICATION SLAVE privilege.
          The value in the master.info file takes
          precedence if it can be read. If the master username is not
          set, the name test is assumed.
        
The size at which the server rotates relay log files automatically. For more information, see Section 6.3.4, “Replication Relay and Status Files”.
          Cause the slave to allow no updates except from slave threads
          or from users having the SUPER privilege.
          This enables you to ensure that a slave server accepts no
          updates from clients. As of MySQL 5.0.16, this option does not
          apply to TEMPORARY tables.
        
          The name for the relay log. The default name is
          host_name-relay-bin.nnnnnnhost_name is the name of the
          slave server host and nnnnnn
          indicates that relay logs are created in numbered sequence.
          You can specify the option to create hostname-independent
          relay log names, or if your relay logs tend to be big (and you
          don't want to decrease max_relay_log_size)
          and you need to put them in some area different from the data
          directory, or if you want to increase speed by balancing load
          between disks.
        
          The name to use for the relay log index file. The default name
          is
          host_name-relay-bin.indexhost_name is the name of the slave
          server.
        
          
          
          --relay-log-info-file=
        file_name
          The name to use for the file in which the slave records
          information about the relay logs. The default name is
          relay-log.info in the data directory.
        
          Disable or enable automatic purging of relay logs as soon as
          they are not needed any more. The default value is 1
          (enabled). This is a global variable that can be changed
          dynamically with SET GLOBAL relay_log_purge =
          .
        N
          This option places an upper limit on the total size in bytes
          of all relay logs on the slave. A value of 0 means “no
          limit.” This is useful for a slave server host that has
          limited disk space. When the limit is reached, the I/O thread
          stops reading binary log events from the master server until
          the SQL thread has caught up and deleted some unused relay
          logs. Note that this limit is not absolute: There are cases
          where the SQL thread needs more events before it can delete
          relay logs. In that case, the I/O thread exceeds the limit
          until it becomes possible for the SQL thread to delete some
          relay logs, because not doing so would cause a deadlock. You
          should not set --relay-log-space-limit to
          less than twice the value of
          --max-relay-log-size (or
          --max-binlog-size if
          --max-relay-log-size is 0). In that case,
          there is a chance that the I/O thread waits for free space
          because --relay-log-space-limit is exceeded,
          but the SQL thread has no relay log to purge and is unable to
          satisfy the I/O thread. This forces the I/O thread to
          temporarily ignore --relay-log-space-limit.
        
          Tell the slave to restrict replication to statements where the
          default database (that is, the one selected by
          USE) is db_name.
          To specify more than one database, use this option multiple
          times, once for each database. Note that this does not
          replicate cross-database statements such as UPDATE
           while having selected a different database
          or no database.
        some_db.some_table SET
          foo='bar'
          An example of what does not work as you might expect: If the
          slave is started with --replicate-do-db=sales
          and you issue the following statements on the master, the
          UPDATE statement is
          not replicated:
        
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
          The main reason for this “just check the default
          database” behavior is that it is difficult from the
          statement alone to know whether it should be replicated (for
          example, if you are using multiple-table
          DELETE statements or multiple-table
          UPDATE statements that act across multiple
          databases). It is also faster to check only the default
          database rather than all databases if there is no need.
        
          If you need cross-database updates to work, use
          --replicate-wild-do-table=
          instead. See Section 6.9, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
        db_name.%
          
          
          --replicate-do-table=
        db_name.tbl_name
          Tell the slave thread to restrict replication to the specified
          table. To specify more than one table, use this option
          multiple times, once for each table. This works for
          cross-database updates, in contrast to
          --replicate-do-db. See
          Section 6.9, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
        
          Tells the slave to not replicate any statement where the
          default database (that is, the one selected by
          USE) is db_name.
          To specify more than one database to ignore, use this option
          multiple times, once for each database. You should not use
          this option if you are using cross-database updates and you do
          not want these updates to be replicated. See
          Section 6.9, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
        
          An example of what does not work as you might expect: If the
          slave is started with
          --replicate-ignore-db=sales and you issue the
          following statements on the master, the
          UPDATE statement is
          not replicated:
        
USE prices; UPDATE sales.january SET amount=amount+1000;
          If you need cross-database updates to work, use
          --replicate-wild-ignore-table=
          instead. See Section 6.9, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
        db_name.%
          
          
          --replicate-ignore-table=
        db_name.tbl_name
          Tells the slave thread to not replicate any statement that
          updates the specified table, even if any other tables might be
          updated by the same statement. To specify more than one table
          to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each
          table. This works for cross-database updates, in contrast to
          --replicate-ignore-db. See
          Section 6.9, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
        
          
          
          --replicate-rewrite-db=
        from_name->to_name
          Tells the slave to translate the default database (that is,
          the one selected by USE) to
          to_name if it was
          from_name on the master. Only
          statements involving tables are affected (not statements such
          as CREATE DATABASE, DROP
          DATABASE, and ALTER DATABASE),
          and only if from_name is the
          default database on the master. This does not work for
          cross-database updates. The database name translation is done
          before the --replicate-*
          rules are tested.
        
          If you use this option on the command line and the
          ‘>’ character is special to
          your command interpreter, quote the option value. For example:
        
shell> mysqld --replicate-rewrite-db="olddb->newdb"
          To be used on slave servers. Usually you should use the
          default setting of 0, to prevent infinite loops caused by
          circular replication. If set to 1, the slave does not skip
          events having its own server ID. Normally, this is useful only
          in rare configurations. Cannot be set to 1 if
          --log-slave-updates is used. Note that by
          default the slave I/O thread does not even write binary log
          events to the relay log if they have the slave's server id
          (this optimization helps save disk usage). So if you want to
          use --replicate-same-server-id, be sure to
          start the slave with this option before you make the slave
          read its own events that you want the slave SQL thread to
          execute.
        
          
          
          --replicate-wild-do-table=
        db_name.tbl_name
          Tells the slave thread to restrict replication to statements
          where any of the updated tables match the specified database
          and table name patterns. Patterns can contain the
          ‘%’ and
          ‘_’ wildcard characters, which
          have the same meaning as for the LIKE
          pattern-matching operator. To specify more than one table, use
          this option multiple times, once for each table. This works
          for cross-database updates. See
          Section 6.9, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
        
          Example: --replicate-wild-do-table=foo%.bar%
          replicates only updates that use a table where the database
          name starts with foo and the table name
          starts with bar.
        
          If the table name pattern is %, it matches
          any table name and the option also applies to database-level
          statements (CREATE DATABASE, DROP
          DATABASE, and ALTER DATABASE).
          For example, if you use
          --replicate-wild-do-table=foo%.%,
          database-level statements are replicated if the database name
          matches the pattern foo%.
        
          To include literal wildcard characters in the database or
          table name patterns, escape them with a backslash. For
          example, to replicate all tables of a database that is named
          my_own%db, but not replicate tables from
          the my1ownAABCdb database, you should
          escape the ‘_’ and
          ‘%’ characters like this:
          --replicate-wild-do-table=my\_own\%db. If
          you're using the option on the command line, you might need to
          double the backslashes or quote the option value, depending on
          your command interpreter. For example, with the
          bash shell, you would need to type
          --replicate-wild-do-table=my\\_own\\%db.
        
          
          
          --replicate-wild-ignore-table=
        db_name.tbl_name
Tells the slave thread not to replicate a statement where any table matches the given wildcard pattern. To specify more than one table to ignore, use this option multiple times, once for each table. This works for cross-database updates. See Section 6.9, “How Servers Evaluate Replication Rules”.
          Example:
          --replicate-wild-ignore-table=foo%.bar% does
          not replicate updates that use a table where the database name
          starts with foo and the table name starts
          with bar.
        
          For information about how matching works, see the description
          of the --replicate-wild-do-table option. The
          rules for including literal wildcard characters in the option
          value are the same as for
          --replicate-wild-ignore-table as well.
        
          The hostname or IP number of the slave to be reported to the
          master during slave registration. This value appears in the
          output of SHOW SLAVE HOSTS on the master
          server. Leave the value unset if you do not want the slave to
          register itself with the master. Note that it is not
          sufficient for the master to simply read the IP number of the
          slave from the TCP/IP socket after the slave connects. Due to
          NAT and other routing issues, that IP may not be valid for
          connecting to the slave from the master or other hosts.
        
The TCP/IP port number for connecting to the slave, to be reported to the master during slave registration. Set this only if the slave is listening on a non-default port or if you have a special tunnel from the master or other clients to the slave. If you are not sure, do not use this option.
          Tells the slave server not to start the slave threads when the
          server starts. To start the threads later, use a
          START SLAVE statement.
        
          
          
          --slave_compressed_protocol={0|1}
        
If this option is set to 1, use compression for the slave/master protocol if both the slave and the master support it.
          The name of the directory where the slave creates temporary
          files. This option is by default equal to the value of the
          tmpdir system variable. When the slave SQL
          thread replicates a LOAD DATA INFILE
          statement, it extracts the file to be loaded from the relay
          log into temporary files, and then loads these into the table.
          If the file loaded on the master is huge, the temporary files
          on the slave are huge, too. Therefore, it might be advisable
          to use this option to tell the slave to put temporary files in
          a directory located in some filesystem that has a lot of
          available space. In that case, the relay logs are huge as
          well, so you might also want to use the
          --relay-log option to place the relay logs in
          that filesystem.
        
          The directory specified by this option should be located in a
          disk-based filesystem (not a memory-based filesystem) because
          the temporary files used to replicate LOAD DATA
          INFILE must survive machine restarts. The directory
          also should not be one that is cleared by the operating system
          during the system startup process.
        
          The number of seconds to wait for more data from the master
          before the slave considers the connection broken, aborts the
          read, and tries to reconnect. The first retry occurs
          immediately after the timeout. The interval between retries is
          controlled by the --master-connect-retry
          option.
        
          
          
          --slave-skip-errors=[
        err_code1,err_code2,...|all]
Normally, replication stops when an error occurs on the slave. This gives you the opportunity to resolve the inconsistency in the data manually. This option tells the slave SQL thread to continue replication when a statement returns any of the errors listed in the option value.
Do not use this option unless you fully understand why you are getting errors. If there are no bugs in your replication setup and client programs, and no bugs in MySQL itself, an error that stops replication should never occur. Indiscriminate use of this option results in slaves becoming hopelessly out of synchrony with the master, with you having no idea why this has occurred.
          For error codes, you should use the numbers provided by the
          error message in your slave error log and in the output of
          SHOW SLAVE STATUS.
          Appendix B, Error Codes and Messages, lists server error codes.
        
          You can also (but should not) use the very non-recommended
          value of all to cause the slave to ignore
          all error messages and keeps going regardless of what happens.
          Needless to say, if you use all, there are
          no guarantees regarding the integrity of your data. Please do
          not complain (or file bug reports) in this case if the slave's
          data is not anywhere close to what it is on the master.
          You have been warned.
        
Examples:
--slave-skip-errors=1062,1053 --slave-skip-errors=all
If a master server does not write a statement to its binary log, the statement is not replicated. If the server does log the statement, the statement is sent to all slaves and each slave determines whether to execute it or ignore it.
      On the master side, decisions about which statements to log are
      based on the --binlog-do-db and
      --binlog-ignore-db options that control binary
      logging. For a description of the rules that servers use in
      evaluating these options, see Section 5.12.3, “The Binary Log”.
    
      On the slave side, decisions about whether to execute or ignore
      statements received from the master are made according to the
      --replicate-* options that the slave was started
      with. (See Section 6.8, “Replication Startup Options”.) The slave
      evaluates these options using the following procedure, which first
      checks the database-level options and then the table-level
      options.
    
      In the simplest case, when there are no
      --replicate-* options, the procedure yields the
      result that the slave executes all statements that it receives
      from the master. Otherwise, the result depends on the particular
      options given. In general, to make it easier to determine what
      effect an option set will have, it is recommended that you avoid
      mixing “do” and “ignore” options, or
      wildcard and non-wildcard options.
    
Stage 1. Check the database options.
      At this stage, the slave checks whether there are any
      --replicate-do-db or
      --replicate-ignore-db options that specify
      database-specific conditions:
    
No: Permit the statement and proceed to the table-checking stage.
          Yes: Test the options using the same
          rules as for the --binlog-do-db and
          --binlog-ignore-db options to determine
          whether to permit or ignore the statement. What is the result
          of the test?
        
Permit: Do not execute the statement immediately. Defer the decision and proceed to the table-checking stage.
Ignore: Ignore the statement and exit.
This stage can permit a statement for further option-checking, or cause it to be ignored. However, statements that are permitted at this stage are not actually executed yet. Instead, they pass to the following stage that checks the table options.
Stage 2. Check the table options.
      First, as a preliminary condition, the slave checks whether the
      statement occurs within a stored function or (prior to MySQL
      5.0.12) a stored procedure. If so, execute the statement and exit.
      (Stored procedures are exempt from this test as of MySQL 5.0.12
      because procedure logging occurs at the level of statements that
      are executed within the routine rather than at the
      CALL level.)
    
      Next, the slave checks for table options and evaluates them. If
      the server reaches this point, it executes all statements if there
      are no table options. If there are “do” table
      options, the statement must match one of them if it is to be
      executed; otherwise, it is ignored. If there are any
      “ignore” options, all statements are executed except
      those that match any ignore option. The
      following steps describe how this evaluation occurs in more
      detail.
    
          Are there any --replicate-*-table options?
        
No: There are no table restrictions, so all statements match. Execute the statement and exit.
              Yes: There are table restrictions.
              Evaluate the tables to be updated against them. There
              might be multiple tables to update, so loop through the
              following steps for each table looking for a matching
              option (first the non-wild options, and then the wild
              options). Only tables that are to be updated are compared
              to the options. For example, if the statement is
              INSERT INTO sales SELECT * FROM prices,
              only sales is compared to the options).
              If several tables are to be updated (multiple-table
              statement), the first table that matches “do”
              or “ignore” wins. That is, the server checks
              the first table against the options. If no decision could
              be made, it checks the second table against the options,
              and so on.
            
          Are there any --replicate-do-table options?
        
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Execute the statement and exit.
          Are there any --replicate-ignore-table
          options?
        
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Ignore the statement and exit.
          Are there any --replicate-wild-do-table
          options?
        
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Execute the statement and exit.
          Are there any --replicate-wild-ignore-table
          options?
        
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Does the table match any of them?
No: Proceed to the next step.
Yes: Ignore the statement and exit.
          No --replicate-*-table option was matched. Is
          there another table to test against these options?
        
              No: We have now tested all tables to
              be updated and could not match any option. Are there
              --replicate-do-table or
              --replicate-wild-do-table options?
            
No: There were no “do” table options, so no explicit “do” match is required. Execute the statement and exit.
Yes: There were “do” table options, so the statement is executed only with an explicit match to one of them. Ignore the statement and exit.
Yes: Loop.
Examples:
          No --replicate-* options at all
        
The slave executes all statements that it receives from the master.
          --replicate-*-db options, but no table
          options
        
The slave permits or ignores statements using the database options. Then it executes all statements permitted by those options because there are no table restrictions.
          --replicate-*-table options, but no database
          options
        
All statements are permitted at the database-checking stage because there are no database conditions. The slave executes or ignores statements based on the table options.
A mix of database and table options
The slave permits or ignores statements using the database options. Then it evaluates all statements permitted by those options according to the table options. In some cases, this process can yield what might seem a counterintuitive result. Consider the following set of options:
[mysqld] replicate-do-db = db1 replicate-do-table = db2.mytbl2
          Suppose that db1 is the default database
          and the slave receives this statement:
        
INSERT INTO mytbl1 VALUES(1,2,3);
          The database is db1, which matches the
          --replicate-do-db option at the
          database-checking stage. The algorithm then proceeds to the
          table-checking stage. If there were no table options, the
          statement would be executed. However, because the options
          include a “do” table option, the statement must
          match if it is to be executed. The statement does not match,
          so it is ignored. (The same would happen for any table in
          db1.)
        
Q: How do I configure a slave if the master is running and I do not want to stop it?
      A: There are several
      possibilities. If you have taken a snapshot backup of the master
      at some point and recorded the binary log filename and offset
      (from the output of SHOW MASTER STATUS)
      corresponding to the snapshot, use the following procedure:
    
Make sure that the slave is assigned a unique server ID.
Execute the following statement on the slave, filling in appropriate values for each option:
mysql>CHANGE MASTER TO->MASTER_HOST='->master_host_name',MASTER_USER='->master_user_name',MASTER_PASSWORD='->master_pass',MASTER_LOG_FILE='->recorded_log_file_name',MASTER_LOG_POS=recorded_log_position;
          Execute START SLAVE on the slave.
        
If you do not have a backup of the master server, here is a quick procedure for creating one. All steps should be performed on the master host.
Issue this statement to acquire a global read lock:
mysql> FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;
With the lock still in place, execute this command (or a variation of it):
shell> tar zcf /tmp/backup.tar.gz /var/lib/mysql
Issue this statement and record the output, which you will need later:
mysql> SHOW MASTER STATUS;
Release the lock:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
An alternative to using the preceding procedure to make a binary copy is to make an SQL dump of the master. To do this, you can use mysqldump --master-data on your master and later load the SQL dump into your slave. However, this is slower than making a binary copy.
Regardless of which of the two methods you use, afterward follow the instructions for the case when you have a snapshot and have recorded the log filename and offset. You can use the same snapshot to set up several slaves. Once you have the snapshot of the master, you can wait to set up a slave as long as the binary logs of the master are left intact. The two practical limitations on the length of time you can wait are the amount of disk space available to retain binary logs on the master and the length of time it takes the slave to catch up.
      You can also use LOAD DATA FROM MASTER. This is
      a convenient statement that transfers a snapshot to the slave and
      adjusts the log filename and offset all at once. Be warned,
      however, that it works only for MyISAM tables
      and it may hold a read lock for a long time. It is not yet
      implemented as efficiently as we would like. If you have large
      tables, the preferred method is still to make a binary snapshot on
      the master server after executing FLUSH TABLES WITH READ
      LOCK.
    
Q: Does the slave need to be connected to the master all the time?
A: No, it does not. The slave can go down or stay disconnected for hours or even days, and then reconnect and catch up on updates. For example, you can set up a master/slave relationship over a dial-up link where the link is up only sporadically and for short periods of time. The implication of this is that, at any given time, the slave is not guaranteed to be in synchrony with the master unless you take some special measures.
Q: How do I know how late a slave is compared to the master? In other words, how do I know the date of the last statement replicated by the slave?
      A: You can read the
      Seconds_Behind_Master column in SHOW
      SLAVE STATUS. See
      Section 6.3, “Replication Implementation Details”.
    
      When the slave SQL thread executes an event read from the master,
      it modifies its own time to the event timestamp. (This is why
      TIMESTAMP is well replicated.) In the
      Time column in the output of SHOW
      PROCESSLIST, the number of seconds displayed for the
      slave SQL thread is the number of seconds between the timestamp of
      the last replicated event and the real time of the slave machine.
      You can use this to determine the date of the last replicated
      event. Note that if your slave has been disconnected from the
      master for one hour, and then reconnects, you may immediately see
      Time values like 3600 for the slave SQL thread
      in SHOW PROCESSLIST. This is because the slave
      is executing statements that are one hour old.
    
Q: How do I force the master to block updates until the slave catches up?
A: Use the following procedure:
On the master, execute these statements:
mysql>FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK;mysql>SHOW MASTER STATUS;
          Record the replication cooredinates (the log filename and
          offset) from the output of the SHOW
          statement.
        
          On the slave, issue the following statement, where the
          arguments to the MASTER_POS_WAIT() function
          are the replication coordinate values obtained in the previous
          step:
        
mysql> SELECT MASTER_POS_WAIT('log_name', log_offset);
          The SELECT statement blocks until the slave
          reaches the specified log file and offset. At that point, the
          slave is in synchrony with the master and the statement
          returns.
        
On the master, issue the following statement to allow the master to begin processing updates again:
mysql> UNLOCK TABLES;
Q: What issues should I be aware of when setting up two-way replication?
A: MySQL replication currently does not support any locking protocol between master and slave to guarantee the atomicity of a distributed (cross-server) update. In other words, it is possible for client A to make an update to co-master 1, and in the meantime, before it propagates to co-master 2, client B could make an update to co-master 2 that makes the update of client A work differently than it did on co-master 1. Thus, when the update of client A makes it to co-master 2, it produces tables that are different from what you have on co-master 1, even after all the updates from co-master 2 have also propagated. This means that you should not chain two servers together in a two-way replication relationship unless you are sure that your updates can safely happen in any order, or unless you take care of mis-ordered updates somehow in the client code.
You should also realize that two-way replication actually does not improve performance very much (if at all) as far as updates are concerned. Each server must do the same number of updates, just as you would have a single server do. The only difference is that there is a little less lock contention, because the updates originating on another server are serialized in one slave thread. Even this benefit might be offset by network delays.
Q: How can I use replication to improve performance of my system?
      A: You should set up one server
      as the master and direct all writes to it. Then configure as many
      slaves as you have the budget and rackspace for, and distribute
      the reads among the master and the slaves. You can also start the
      slaves with the --skip-innodb,
      --skip-bdb,
      --low-priority-updates, and
      --delay-key-write=ALL options to get speed
      improvements on the slave end. In this case, the slave uses
      non-transactional MyISAM tables instead of
      InnoDB and BDB tables to get
      more speed by eliminating transactional overhead.
    
Q: What should I do to prepare client code in my own applications to use performance-enhancing replication?
A: If the part of your code that is responsible for database access has been properly abstracted/modularized, converting it to run with a replicated setup should be very smooth and easy. Change the implementation of your database access to send all writes to the master, and to send reads to either the master or a slave. If your code does not have this level of abstraction, setting up a replicated system gives you the opportunity and motivation to it clean up. Start by creating a wrapper library or module that implements the following functions:
          safe_writer_connect()
        
          safe_reader_connect()
        
          safe_reader_statement()
        
          safe_writer_statement()
        
      safe_ in each function name means that the
      function takes care of handling all error conditions. You can use
      different names for the functions. The important thing is to have
      a unified interface for connecting for reads, connecting for
      writes, doing a read, and doing a write.
    
Then convert your client code to use the wrapper library. This may be a painful and scary process at first, but it pays off in the long run. All applications that use the approach just described are able to take advantage of a master/slave configuration, even one involving multiple slaves. The code is much easier to maintain, and adding troubleshooting options is trivial. You need modify only one or two functions; for example, to log how long each statement took, or which statement among those issued gave you an error.
If you have written a lot of code, you may want to automate the conversion task by using the replace utility that comes with standard MySQL distributions, or write your own conversion script. Ideally, your code uses consistent programming style conventions. If not, then you are probably better off rewriting it anyway, or at least going through and manually regularizing it to use a consistent style.
Q: When and how much can MySQL replication improve the performance of my system?
A: MySQL replication is most beneficial for a system that processes frequent reads and infrequent writes. In theory, by using a single-master/multiple-slave setup, you can scale the system by adding more slaves until you either run out of network bandwidth, or your update load grows to the point that the master cannot handle it.
      To determine how many slaves you can use before the added benefits
      begin to level out, and how much you can improve performance of
      your site, you need to know your query patterns, and to determine
      empirically by benchmarking the relationship between the
      throughput for reads (reads per second, or
      reads) and for writes
      (writes) on a typical master and a typical
      slave. The example here shows a rather simplified calculation of
      what you can get with replication for a hypothetical system.
    
      Let's say that system load consists of 10% writes and 90% reads,
      and we have determined by benchmarking that
      reads is 1200 – 2 ×
      writes. In other words, the system can do 1,200
      reads per second with no writes, the average write is twice as
      slow as the average read, and the relationship is linear. Let us
      suppose that the master and each slave have the same capacity, and
      that we have one master and N slaves.
      Then we have for each server (master or slave):
    
      reads = 1200 – 2 × writes
    
      reads = 9 × writes / ( (reads are split, but writes go to all servers)
    N
      + 1)
      9 × writes / (
    N + 1) + 2
      × writes = 1200
      writes = 1200 / (2 +
      9/(
    N+1))
      The last equation indicates the maximum number of writes for
      N slaves, given a maximum possible read
      rate of 1,200 per minute and a ratio of nine reads per write.
    
This analysis yields the following conclusions:
          If N = 0 (which means we have no
          replication), our system can handle about 1200/11 = 109 writes
          per second.
        
          If N = 1, we get up to 184 writes
          per second.
        
          If N = 8, we get up to 400 writes
          per second.
        
          If N = 17, we get up to 480 writes
          per second.
        
          Eventually, as N approaches
          infinity (and our budget negative infinity), we can get very
          close to 600 writes per second, increasing system throughput
          about 5.5 times. However, with only eight servers, we increase
          it nearly four times.
        
      Note that these computations assume infinite network bandwidth and
      neglect several other factors that could be significant on your
      system. In many cases, you may not be able to perform a
      computation similar to the one just shown that accurately predicts
      what will happen on your system if you add
      N replication slaves. However,
      answering the following questions should help you decide whether
      and by how much replication will improve the performance of your
      system:
    
What is the read/write ratio on your system?
How much more write load can one server handle if you reduce the reads?
For how many slaves do you have bandwidth available on your network?
Q: How can I use replication to provide redundancy or high availability?
A: With the currently available features, you would have to set up a master and a slave (or several slaves), and to write a script that monitors the master to check whether it is up. Then instruct your applications and the slaves to change master in case of failure. Some suggestions:
          To tell a slave to change its master, use the CHANGE
          MASTER TO statement.
        
          A good way to keep your applications informed as to the
          location of the master is by having a dynamic DNS entry for
          the master. With bind you can use
          nsupdate to dynamically update your DNS.
        
          Run your slaves with the --log-bin option and
          without --log-slave-updates. In this way, the
          slave is ready to become a master as soon as you issue
          STOP SLAVE; RESET
          MASTER, and CHANGE MASTER TO
          statement on the other slaves. For example, assume that you
          have the following setup:
        
       WC
        \
         v
 WC----> M
       / | \
      /  |  \
     v   v   v
    S1   S2  S3
          In this diagram, M means the master,
          S the slaves, WC the
          clients issuing database writes and reads; clients that issue
          only database reads are not represented, because they need not
          switch. S1, S2, and
          S3 are slaves running with
          --log-bin and without
          --log-slave-updates. Because updates received
          by a slave from the master are not logged in the binary log
          unless --log-slave-updates is specified, the
          binary log on each slave is empty initially. If for some
          reason M becomes unavailable, you can pick
          one of the slaves to become the new master. For example, if
          you pick S1, all WC
          should be redirected to S1, which will log
          updates to its binary log. S2 and
          S3 should then replicate from
          S1.
        
          The reason for running the slave without
          --log-slave-updates is to prevent slaves from
          receiving updates twice in case you cause one of the slaves to
          become the new master. Suppose that S1 has
          --log-slave-updates enabled. Then it will
          write updates that it receives from M to
          its own binary log. When S2 changes from
          M to S1 as its master,
          it may receive updates from S1 that it has
          already received from M
        
          Make sure that all slaves have processed any statements in
          their relay log. On each slave, issue STOP SLAVE
          IO_THREAD, then check the output of SHOW
          PROCESSLIST until you see Has read all
          relay log. When this is true for all slaves, they
          can be reconfigured to the new setup. On the slave
          S1 being promoted to become the master,
          issue STOP SLAVE and RESET
          MASTER.
        
          On the other slaves S2 and
          S3, use STOP SLAVE and
          CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_HOST='S1' (where
          'S1' represents the real hostname of
          S1). To CHANGE MASTER,
          add all information about how to connect to
          S1 from S2 or
          S3 (user,
          password,
          port). In CHANGE
          MASTER, there is no need to specify the name of
          S1's binary log or binary log position to
          read from: We know it is the first binary log and position 4,
          which are the defaults for CHANGE MASTER.
          Finally, use START SLAVE on
          S2 and S3.
        
          Then instruct all WC to direct their
          statements to S1. From that point on, all
          updates statements sent by WC to
          S1 are written to the binary log of
          S1, which then contains every update
          statement sent to S1 since
          M died.
        
The result is this configuration:
       WC
      /
      |
 WC   |  M(unavailable)
  \   |
   \  |
    v v
     S1<--S2  S3
      ^       |
      +-------+
          When M is up again, you must issue on it
          the same CHANGE MASTER as that issued on
          S2 and S3, so that
          M becomes a slave of S1
          and picks up all the WC writes that it
          missed while it was down. To make M a
          master again (because it is the most powerful machine, for
          example), use the preceding procedure as if
          S1 was unavailable and M
          was to be the new master. During this procedure, do not forget
          to run RESET MASTER on M
          before making S1, S2,
          and S3 slaves of M.
          Otherwise, they may pick up old WC writes
          from before the point at which M became
          unavailable.
        
Note that there is no synchronization between the different slaves to a master. Some slaves might be ahead of others. This means that the concept outlined in the previous example might not work. In practice, however, the relay logs of different slaves will most likely not be far behind the master, so it would work, anyway (but there is no guarantee).
Q: Does replication work on mixed operating systems (for example, the master runs on Linux while slaves run on Mac OS X and Windows)?
A: Yes.
Q: Does replication work on mixed hardware architectures (for example, the master runs on a 64-bit machine while slaves run on 32-bit machines)?
A: Yes.
If you have followed the instructions, and your replication setup is not working, the first thing to do is check the error log for messages. Many users have lost time by not doing this soon enough after encountering problems.
If you cannot tell from the error log what the problem was, try the following techniques:
          Verify that the master has binary logging enabled by issuing a
          SHOW MASTER STATUS statement. If logging is
          enabled, Position is non-zero. If binary
          logging is not enabled, verify that you are running the master
          with the --log-bin and
          --server-id options.
        
          Verify that the slave is running. Use SHOW SLAVE
          STATUS to check whether the
          Slave_IO_Running and
          Slave_SQL_Running values are both
          Yes. If not, verify the options that were
          used when starting the slave server. For example,
          --skip-slave-start prevents the slave threads
          from starting until you issue a START SLAVE
          statement.
        
          If the slave is running, check whether it established a
          connection to the master. Use SHOW
          PROCESSLIST, find the I/O and SQL threads and check
          their State column to see what they
          display. See
          Section 6.3, “Replication Implementation Details”. If the
          I/O thread state says Connecting to master,
          verify the privileges for the replication user on the master,
          the master hostname, your DNS setup, whether the master is
          actually running, and whether it is reachable from the slave.
        
If the slave was running previously but has stopped, the reason usually is that some statement that succeeded on the master failed on the slave. This should never happen if you have taken a proper snapshot of the master, and never modified the data on the slave outside of the slave thread. If the slave stops unexpectedly, it is a bug or you have encountered one of the known replication limitations described in Section 6.7, “Replication Features and Known Problems”. If it is a bug, see Section 6.12, “How to Report Replication Bugs or Problems”, for instructions on how to report it.
If a statement that succeeded on the master refuses to run on the slave, try the following procedure if it is not feasible to do a full database resynchronization by deleting the slave's databases and copying a new snapshot from the master:
              Determine whether the affected table on the slave is
              different from the master table. Try to understand how
              this happened. Then make the slave's table identical to
              the master's and run START SLAVE.
            
If the preceding step does not work or does not apply, try to understand whether it would be safe to make the update manually (if needed) and then ignore the next statement from the master.
If you decide that you can skip the next statement from the master, issue the following statements:
mysql>SET GLOBAL SQL_SLAVE_SKIP_COUNTER =mysql>N;START SLAVE;
              The value of N should be 1 if
              the next statement from the master does not use
              AUTO_INCREMENT or
              LAST_INSERT_ID(). Otherwise, the value
              should be 2. The reason for using a value of 2 for
              statements that use AUTO_INCREMENT or
              LAST_INSERT_ID() is that they take two
              events in the binary log of the master.
            
If you are sure that the slave started out perfectly synchronized with the master, and that no one has updated the tables involved outside of the slave thread, then presumably the discrepancy is the result of a bug. If you are running the most recent version of MySQL, please report the problem. If you are running an older version, try upgrading to the latest production release to determine whether the problem persists.
When you have determined that there is no user error involved, and replication still either does not work at all or is unstable, it is time to send us a bug report. We need to obtain as much information as possible from you to be able to track down the bug. Please spend some time and effort in preparing a good bug report.
If you have a repeatable test case that demonstrates the bug, please enter it into our bugs database using the instructions given in Section 1.8, “How to Report Bugs or Problems”. If you have a “phantom” problem (one that you cannot duplicate at will), use the following procedure:
Verify that no user error is involved. For example, if you update the slave outside of the slave thread, the data goes out of synchrony, and you can have unique key violations on updates. In this case, the slave thread stops and waits for you to clean up the tables manually to bring them into synchrony. This is not a replication problem. It is a problem of outside interference causing replication to fail.
          Run the slave with the --log-slave-updates
          and --log-bin options. These options cause
          the slave to log the updates that it receives from the master
          into its own binary logs.
        
Save all evidence before resetting the replication state. If we have no information or only sketchy information, it becomes difficult or impossible for us to track down the problem. The evidence you should collect is:
All binary logs from the master
All binary logs from the slave
              The output of SHOW MASTER STATUS from
              the master at the time you discovered the problem
            
              The output of SHOW SLAVE STATUS from
              the slave at the time you discovered the problem
            
Error logs from the master and the slave
          Use mysqlbinlog to examine the binary logs.
          The following should be helpful to find the problem statement.
          log_pos and
          log_file are the
          Master_Log_File and
          Read_Master_Log_Pos values from
          SHOW SLAVE STATUS.
        
shell> mysqlbinlog -j log_pos log_file | head
After you have collected the evidence for the problem, try to isolate it as a separate test case first. Then enter the problem with as much information as possible into our bugs database using the instructions at Section 1.8, “How to Report Bugs or Problems”.
      When multiple servers are configured as replication masters,
      special steps must be taken to prevent key collisions when using
      AUTO_INCREMENT columns, otherwise multiple
      masters may attempt to use the same
      AUTO_INCREMENT value when inserting rows.
    
      The auto_increment_increment and
      auto_increment_offset system variables help to
      accommodate multiple-master replication with
      AUTO_INCREMENT columns. Each of these variables
      has a default and minimum value of 1, and a maximum value of
      65,535. They were introduced in MySQL 5.0.2.
    
      These two variables effect AUTO_INCREMENT
      column behavior as follows:
    
          auto_increment_increment controls the
          increment between successive AUTO_INCREMENT
          values.
        
          auto_increment_offset determines the
          starting point for AUTO_INCREMENT column
          values.
        
      By choosing non-conflicting values for these variables on
      different masters, servers in a multiple-master configuration will
      not use conflicting AUTO_INCREMENT values when
      inserting new rows into the same table. To set up
      N master servers, set the variables
      like this:
    
          Set auto_increment_increment to
          N on each master.
        
          Set each of the N masters to have a
          different auto_increment_offset, using the
          values 1, 2, …, N.
        
      For additional information about
      auto_increment_increment and
      auto_increment_offset, see
      Section 5.2.2, “Server System Variables”.